The Freedom Blog

Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Recently, the European Parliament adapted its internal procedures. According to the newly introduced ‘Rule 165’, the President of the session may interrupt the live broadcasting in case of ‘defamatory, racist or xenophobic language or behavior’ by another Member.He may also deny the right to speak for the duration of the session, if the speaker chooses to continue, and delete the offensive speech from the electronic records. The plenary live-streaming feature was introduced by the European Parliament several years ago precisely to ensure transparency of proceedings and to bring the European Parliament closer to citizens.
He may also deny the right to speak for the duration of the session, if the speaker chooses to continue, and delete the offensive speech from the electronic records. The plenary live-streaming feature was introduced by the European Parliament several years ago precisely to ensure transparency of proceedings and to bring the European Parliament closer to citizens.
Deleting parts of the discourse, no matter how offensive, contradicts the very principle of transparency the EU Parliament claims to promote. And by the way, who defines what exactly “defamatory, xenophobic or racist” language is? By denying the citizens’ democratic access to opposing viewpoints, the EU Parliament shows distrust in its constituents’ right to make their own critical assessments.
Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Author :
Print

Leave a Reply